🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Movement is often defined by distinct phases.

1. The Big Idea

A charismatic leader or figureheads present a new and transcendent idea offering a panacea for alienated and vulnerable people.

So here we are. Plans are in motion to challenge the establishment in Australia. The gunships are circling. Smoke is rising from the out-houses. A lone figure, vulnerable, shivering, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET displayed prominently as a statement, has emerged through the lines and is being led away in secrecy to a different team elsewhere.

Do you ever miss the beginning, when everything was fresh? The days of Bazball 1.0, of Bazball without brains.

2. Love-Bombing

Cult leaders guarantee a fresh beginning, a brighter tomorrow, camaraderie, redemption together who all believe in the philosophy.

How did it feel back then? A team united basking in glory. Ink. Muscles. Jawlines. Elite male wellness energy. Admittedly, England’s players insist it’s not a real term, amusingly since it’s not recognized, what exactly did I just watch?

Yet it’s clear what it is. It’s the player executing a stroke so depraved it defies description. It’s the adrenaline of the leader at his peak, an expression conveying: thoughtful warrior, rugged appearance, hair woven from beaver hide, so authentically Modern Savage you half-expect to look down and see him playing in the field shirtless embracing nature.

It’s the opener often seen to talk in press conferences, out there looking like a joyful figure smartly dressed, expressing thoughts like we’re challenging norms. Indeed, the atmosphere, initially, was only good energy.

3. The Growth Phase

Growth phase. Togetherness strengthened by rote learning of key phrases. These beliefs are often illogical to prove commitment.

Am I alone? The reaction, the fury, the sense of betrayal post-defeat feels overblown, too much. The performance was poor in Perth, as history shows. They were torn apart defensively during a brief period when tactics failed, manipulated by the batsman playing aggressively but smarter, adjusting to the pitch, a performer excelling with brilliance.

Currently, we see the pile-on, the anger, the sense of English Test cricket as a failure. The consensus is that England don’t just need to lose, they need to lose righteously, to be cleansed, flame-throwered, defeated by the vengeful purity of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the conventional tactics of the veteran, seen enjoying achievements humbly like he’s just been given a rewarding prize. What impact will this have?

4. External Conflict

Problems arise due to setbacks. Yet, mistakes are denied. It begins to thrive on anger towards critics.

The fact remains, approaching the next match, we have now reached a delicious point of tension in the story of this approach. England could quite easily win in the next Test in a blur of adrenal disruption. Probably, failure may follow. Should they fail it seems we could be witnessing the death cult phase.

Ahead of this, a couple of points worth saying about this. In the past, during the initial excitement, of light and heat, an piece was published calling it a phenomenon. Criticism followed, which was helpful as it’s known how to confirm that it’s not a closed group is should followers send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages denying scrutiny of its truths.

What has happened lately is just as interesting. Opposition to the style is now the trend. We have a uniformly angry internet, disappointed commentators, images of frustrated supporters abroad cheated out of three days of cricket, similar to investors demanding recourse.

On the other hand, we have the wider backdrop of Australia’s more nuanced deep-seated frustration at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, claiming, your cherished traditions and have honed as one way of separating yourself from others, it’s not serious ultimately.

And this is the real point. All movements are similar. The approach was a phenomenon as the game has its own culture. Or rather, the team has long been exclusive, a circle, a garden party, an insular community with a long history of tradition and mystery supporting it. It has long been a place where power and access are hoarded. It’s the British pastime of the British, the pioneering brand. And surprisingly, Britain is itself a cult, a structure of hidden ranks, a monarchy still exists.

The players have been isolated within this world since childhood. Attempting to break free, to foster positivity, they are simply replicating their own experience, building another enclosure, an exclusive group, however with a new team and a leader promoting authenticity provided you conform.

Live where your feet are. Confront risks. However much you change, things stay similar.

With this mind, it might be appropriate to have some sympathy for the approach, to appreciate its good points, of which there are many. What is Bazball? Promoting liberation. Challenging orthodoxies. Batting aggressively|Attacking with